Footage that kills the conspiracy theories: Unseen 9/11 footage shows WTC Building 7 consumed by fire
The article, as anybody with any interest in 9/11 Truth would immediately realise, does nothing of the sort - it actually proves the anomalies to which the likes of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth - ae911truth.org - have been drawing attention for years.
But InfoPuppy, Paul Joseph Watson, attempts to respond with an article with the lethal precision of a sucker tipped child's bow and arrow:
‘Footage That Kills 9/11 Conspiracy Theories’ Actually Validates Them
In his article, Watson points to Keneally's accusation of 'conspiracy theorists' inventing 'wild claims' having, for the second time, two paragraphs earlier made a wild claim and then goes on to repeat it. He said:
'Keneally goes on to bizarrely claim that the footage proves how “the building’s exterior frame could no longer withstand the high temperatures,” and how the “buckling” of these “exterior metal beams,” “led to floors falling in on one another, causing the building to collapse.'”
'Yes you read that correctly – Keneally is claiming that the structural integrity of modern buildings – the part that prevents them from collapsing – rests on “exterior metal beams”'
Then says:
'If you knew that a building was supported by its “exterior” beams you wouldn’t even dare go inside. The building would never even be approved for construction in the first place.'
And later concludes:
'...Keneally has dreamt up the wildest claim yet – that the structural integrity of modern buildings rests on their exterior beams and window frames.'
Whilst WTC 7 may not have been an external steel framed building, why does Watson ludicrously make such a statement when external steel framed buildings are hardly uncommon.
Anybody familiar with the subject will probably know the point Watson was trying to make but by writing such a badly thought out article he makes himself look like a smart-arsed idiot.
No comments:
Post a Comment